Peel back the AI answer
See what ChatGPT and Google say about your brand, which pages they read, and what to fix first.
Our view
Here is our view on what it should be.
Unlike traditional SaaS, the cost basis for AI visibility tools varies widely by client. Smaller businesses can spend a couple of dollars per month. Enterprises can spend thousands. Multiple tiers don't make sense. Usage-based pricing does.
It shouldn't matter whether you use the tool via a human UI or connect your AI agent. Action, feature, and data pricing should stay the same.
With a pay-as-you-go model, sharing access with co-workers, agencies, and AI agents shouldn't cost anything extra.
Every paying user can suggest features and vote for them. Developers prioritize what gets the most upvotes.
Every recommendation should be clearly executable by a normal marketing team, a specialized contractor, or an AI agent.
Contractors, services, and AI agents that can fix visibility issues should be available right on the platform. You can call it a marketplace where humans and AI make promises, get paid, deliver results, and get proof of work and a rating.
Onionic is coming soon. Tell us what you think in the discussion on LinkedIn.